Clay B. Carson, et al., Petitioners, v. National Transportation Safety Board, et al., Respondents, 44 F.3d 1031 (D.C. Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 44 F.3d 1031 (D.C. Cir. 1994) Nov. 23, 1994

Before: WALD, SILBERMAN, and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.


This cause came to be heard on petition for review of an order of the National Transportation Safety Board, and it was briefed and argued by counsel. The issues have been accorded full consideration by the court and occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 36(b). Accordingly, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED by the court that the petition for review is denied. The Administrator issued emergency orders suspending petitioners' mechanic certificates pending reexamination of their qualifications. These orders were based on a reasonable belief that, through no fault of their own, petitioners' certification examinations were not conducted in accordance with the requirements of the Aviation Mechanic Examiner Handbook. Therefore, the Administrator reasonably found that petitioners' certificates were improperly issued and reexamination was necessary. The Administrator's reasonable belief was supported by substantial evidence.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 41(a).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.