Autek Systems Corporation, v. United States of America; Small Business Administration;patricia F. Saiki, Honorable, Administrator of the Smallbusiness Administration; Judith A. Watts, Associateadministrator of the Minority Small Business and Capitalownership Development; Erskine Bowles, Administrator of Thesmall Business Administration, 43 F.3d 712 (D.C. Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 43 F.3d 712 (D.C. Cir. 1994) May 13, 1994

Before: MIKVA, Chief Judge, and SILBERMAN and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges

ORDER

PER CURIAM.


Upon consideration of the motion for summary affirmance, the response thereto, and the reply, it is

ORDERED that the motion be granted substantially for the reasons stated by the district court in its order filed October 22, 1993. The merits of the parties' positions are so clear as to warrant summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (per curiam); Walker v. Washington, 627 F.2d 541, 545 (D.C. Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 994 (1980).

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 41.