United States of America, Plaintiff Appellee, v. Wayne Maurice Byrd, Defendant Appellant, 36 F.3d 1094 (4th Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 36 F.3d 1094 (4th Cir. 1994) Submitted Aug. 25, 1994Decided Sept. 27, 1994

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge. (CR-90-350, CA-93-3969-H)

Wayne Maurice Byrd, Appellant Pro Se.

William Warren Hamel, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before RUSSELL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Byrd, Nos. CR-90-350; CA-93-3969-H (D. Md. Mar. 9, 1994). We deny Appellant's motion for stay and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED