Ernest Snell; Evelyn Snell, Plaintiffs Appellants, v. South Carolina Public Service Authority, A/k/a Santeecooper; Lawrence M. White; Robert Petracca; G. Dentonlindsay; John Doe Sanders; John Roe Gilbert; Horger,barnwell & Reid, Law Firm; Samuel T. Reid, Defendants Appellees, 35 F.3d 557 (4th Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-90-2911-5-8-BC)
Ernest Snell, Evelyn Snell, appellants Pro Se.
Julius Walker McKay, II, McKay, McKay, Henry & Foster, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina; David Clifford Eckstrom, Nexen, Pruet, Jacobs & Pollard, Columbia, SC, for appellees.
Before HALL, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellants appeal from the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Defendants in their civil action. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Snell v. South Carolina Pub. Serv. Auth., No. CA-90-2911-5-8-BC (D.S.C. Sept. 3, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
