Thurman S. Boykin, Plaintiff Appellant, v. George E. Currie, Superintendent; Stanley Stewart; Hubertpalmer Hines, Defendants Appellees, 34 F.3d 1066 (4th Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseDecided Aug. 4, 1994
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-92-546)
Thurman S. Boykin, appellant pro se.
LaVee Hamer, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, N.C., for appellees.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Boykin v. Currie, No. CA-92-546 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 21, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
