Carlos Ivan Caparroso, Plaintiff Appellant, v. John Doe, Regional Director; Warden, Federal Correctionalinstitute; John Doe, Ii, Physician Assistant; John Doe,iii, Physician Assistant; John Doe, Iv, Physicianassistant; John Doe V, Physician Assistant; John Doe, Vi,security Officer; John Doe, Vii, Security Officer; Johndoe, Viii, Security Officer; John Doe, Ix, Securityofficer; John Doe, X, Security Officer; Jane Doe, Securityofficer; Jane Doe, Ii, Security Officer, Defendants Appellees,andfederal Director of Prison, Defendant, 30 F.3d 128 (4th Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-93-1426).
Carlos Ivan Caparroso, appellant Pro Se.
Rachel Celia Ballow, Office of the United States Atty., Alexandria, VA, for appellees.
E.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Caparroso v. Doe, No. CA-93-1426 (E.D. Va. May 3, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and for production of documents. See Whisenant v. Yuam, 739 F.2d 160 (4th Cir. 1984)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
