Carlos Ivan Caparroso, Plaintiff Appellant, v. John Doe, Regional Director; Warden, Federal Correctionalinstitute; John Doe, Ii, Physician Assistant; John Doe,iii, Physician Assistant; John Doe, Iv, Physicianassistant; John Doe V, Physician Assistant; John Doe, Vi,security Officer; John Doe, Vii, Security Officer; Johndoe, Viii, Security Officer; John Doe, Ix, Securityofficer; John Doe, X, Security Officer; Jane Doe, Securityofficer; Jane Doe, Ii, Security Officer, Defendants Appellees,andfederal Director of Prison, Defendant, 30 F.3d 128 (4th Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 30 F.3d 128 (4th Cir. 1994)

Submitted June 23, 1994. Decided July 27, 1994

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-93-1426).

Carlos Ivan Caparroso, appellant Pro Se.

Rachel Celia Ballow, Office of the United States Atty., Alexandria, VA, for appellees.

E.D. Va.


Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.


Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.*  Caparroso v. Doe, No. CA-93-1426 (E.D. Va. May 3, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.



We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and for production of documents. See Whisenant v. Yuam, 739 F.2d 160 (4th Cir. 1984)