United States of America, Plaintiff Appellee, v. Abdul Saiyed, Defendant Appellant.united States of America, Plaintiff Appellee, v. Abdul Saiyed, Defendant Appellant, 28 F.3d 1212 (4th Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseAppeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR-86-19, CA-94-103-S)
Abdul Saiyed, appellant Pro Se.
Susan Moss Ringler, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for appellee.
D. Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion and denying his motion for return of property. Our review of the record and the district court's orders discloses that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Saiyed, No. CR-86-19; No. CA-94-103-S (D. Md. Dec. 13, 1993; Jan. 31, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Additionally, we deny Appellant's motions for trial transcripts
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
