United States of America, Plaintiff Appellee, v. Randy Potts, Party in Interest Appellant,andone 1981 Mercedes Benz, Vin Wdbba45a4bb009109, Defendant, 23 F.3d 404 (4th Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, District Judge. (CA-93-173-P-3)
Randy Potts, appellant pro se.
Robert Jack Higdon, Jr., Office of the U.S. Atty., Charlotte, NC, for appellee.
W.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting default judgment of forfeiture. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Potts No. CA-93-173-P-3 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 9, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
