Gardner Bradley, Plaintiff Appellant, v. Robert S. Carr, United States Magistrate Judge, Defendant Appellee, 21 F.3d 421 (4th Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-93-2941-17BC-2)
Gardner Bradley, appellant pro se.
D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before PHILLIPS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order that construed his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint as an action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and dismissed it. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bradley v. Carr, No. CA-93-2941-17BC-2 (D.S.C. Nov. 30, 1993).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
We deny Bradley's motion to place this case in abeyance
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
