United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Michael Reynolds Roig, Defendant-appellant, 19 F.3d 13 (4th Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-90-106-S).
Michael Reynolds Roig, Appellant Pro Se.
David Bernard Smith, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, NC, for Appellee.
M.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, WILKINSON, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Roig, No. CR-90-106-S (M.D.N.C. Aug. 16, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
