Cornelius Tucker, Jr., Plaintiff Appellant, v. John H. Connell; Francis E. Dail; T. Woods; J. Gregorywallace, Defendants Appellees, 16 F.3d 411 (4th Cir. 1994)Annotate this Case
Submitted Jan. 20, 1994. Decided Feb. 10, 1994
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-93-405-CRT-BO)
Cornelius Tucker, Jr., appellant pro se.
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tucker v. Connell, No. CA-93-405-CRT-BO (E.D.N.C. July 16, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.