Daniel Marion Schroyer, Plaintiff Appellant, v. Officer Whittle, Greensville Correctional Center Officer,individually and in Her Capacities As an Officerof Doc, Defendant Appellee, 16 F.3d 411 (4th Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-93-633-2)
Daniel Marion Schroyer, Appellant Pro Se.
E.D. Va.
Affirmed.
Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM
Appellant filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). The district court assessed a filing fee pursuant to Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and directed the Plaintiff to pay the fee or explain any withdrawals or circumstances warranting excuse from payment. When Appellant failed to obey this order, the district court dismissed the case without prejudice. Ballard v. Carlson, 882 F.2d 93 (4th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1084 (1990). Plaintiff appeals.* Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Appellant also appeals from the order denying his motion that the district court judge recuse herself. Because Appellant failed to show a personal bias resulting from an extra-judicial source, In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 827 (4th Cir. 1987), we affirm this order
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
