Daniel T. Alvy, a General Partner, et al., Appellants, v. Henry G. Cisneros, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 13 F.3d 421 (D.C. Cir. 1993)

 Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 13 F.3d 421 (D.C. Cir. 1993) Nov. 30, 1993

Before BUCKLEY and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges, and LEVIN H. CAMPBELL, U.S. Senior Circuit Judge for the First Circuit.1 

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This case was considered on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and the briefs and arguments by counsel. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 14(c). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by this court that the judgment of the district court be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in its memorandum opinion and order. The contract upon which appellants rely is invalid, and HUD's interpretation of EHLIPA is reasonable.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 15.

 1

Sitting by designation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 294(d)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.