Soon Park, Appellant, v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, Appellee, 107 F.3d 924 (D.C. Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 107 F.3d 924 (D.C. Cir. 1996) Nov. 4, 1996

Before SILBERMAN, RANDOLPH, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.


This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 36(b). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's order filed July 6, 1995, be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in the court's opinion of that date. The court's finding that appellee did not discriminate against appellant on the basis of race or national original and reprisal is not clearly erroneous, see Fed. R. App. P. 52(a); Pullman-Standard v. Swint, 456 U.S. 273, 290 (1982), and any error in excluding Exhibits 1 and 21 was harmless.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.