Paul S. Burka, Trustee and Robert A. Burka, Trustee, Appellants, v. Aetna Life Insurance Company, a Connecticut Corporation, Etal., Appellees, 107 F.3d 922 (D.C. Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 107 F.3d 922 (D.C. Cir. 1996) Oct. 22, 1996

Before WILLIAMS, ROGERS and TATEL, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.


This appeal was considered on the record before the United States district court for the District of Columbia, and on the briefs of counsel and oral argument before this court. The issues have been accorded full consideration by this court and occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 36(b).

Appellants challenge the district court's issuance of a preliminary injunction and denial of their motion to alter or amend that preliminary injunction. Substantially for the reasons of the district court, see Burka v. Aetna Life Ins. Co. 917 F. Supp. 8 (D.D.C. 1996), it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by this court that the judgment of the district court be affirmed.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 41(a).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.