Joseph N. Briggs, Appellant, v. Anthony M. James, Postmaster General, 995 F.2d 305 (D.C. Cir. 1993)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 995 F.2d 305 (D.C. Cir. 1993) May 20, 1993

Before: WALD, RUTH B. GINSBURG and SILBERMAN, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.


These appeals were considered on the records from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by appellant. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 14(c). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's orders filed January 28, 1992, dismissing appellant's complaints be affirmed. The court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing these actions as frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d); Denton v. Hernandez, 112 S. Ct. 1728, 1734 (1992).

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 15.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.