Sylvester Jones, Appellant v. Thomas Penfield Jackson, United States District Court Judge, et al, 995 F.2d 305 (D.C. Cir. 1993)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 995 F.2d 305 (D.C. Cir. 1993) May 20, 1993. Rehearing and Rehearing En BancDenied July 16, 1993

Before: WALD, RUTH B. GINSBURG and SILBERMAN, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.


This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 14(c). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's order filed March 18, 1992 be affirmed for the reasons stated therein. The district court properly dismissed appellant's case pursuant to the order in Jones v. Suter, No. 91-2142 (D.D.C. Sept. 27, 1991), which bars appellant from filing any further civil actions in the district court without first seeking that court's leave and certifying that any such action raises new matters never before decided on the merits by any federal court. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's motion for summary judgment by default, and appellant's motion for order pursuant to Title 42 U.S.C. Sections 1981, 1985(3) and 1986, be dismissed as moot.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 15.