United States of America v. Raymond Charles Murphy, A/k/a William Murphy, Appellant, 993 F.2d 914 (D.C. Cir. 1993)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 993 F.2d 914 (D.C. Cir. 1993) April 26, 1993

Before: WALD, RUTH B. GINSBURG and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.


This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 14(c). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's judgment filed March 11, 1992, be affirmed. The district court did not err in denying Murphy's request for a two-point reduction in his base offense level. See United States v. Rodriguez, 928 F.2d 65, 67 (2d Cir. 1991) (a second offense while awaiting sentencing for the first offense is a relevant consideration in denying the acceptance of responsibility adjustment for the first offense).

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 15.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.