Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.frank J. Camoscio, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the Board of Registrationin Podiatry, Defendants, Appellees, 989 F.2d 484 (1st Cir. 1993)

We have reviewed the record in this case and are persuaded that this action, the appellant's third against the defendant Board of Registration in Podiatry, is frivolous, vexatious, and barred by res judicata, the Rooker doctrine, and the statute of limitations. See Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 416 (1923); Street v. Vose, 936 F.2d 38 (1st Cir. 1991) (per curiam). Accordingly, the appellees' motion for summary disposition is allowed and the judgment dismissing the instant complaint is affirmed. We further affirm the district court's order enjoining the appellant from filing any further actions without either obtaining leave of court or the aid and signature of counsel.