United States of America v. Mesfin S. Halefom, Appellant, 979 F.2d 248 (D.C. Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseBefore STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, SENTELLE and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and oral arguments of counsel. The court is satisfied, after full review of the issue presented, that appropriate disposition of the appeal does not warrant a further opinion. Substantially for the reasons stated by the district court in its Order of July 3, 1991, we find that appellant could not have prevailed on his Fourth Amendment claim and so was not denied effective assistance of counsel in violation of the Sixth Amendment. It is thus
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment from which this appeal has been taken be affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.