In Re Roszetta M. Mcneill, Petitioner, 976 F.2d 46 (D.C. Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 976 F.2d 46 (D.C. Cir. 1992) Aug. 28, 1992

Before MIKVA, Chief Judge, and BUCKLEY and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the motion for expedited consideration and the petition for a writ of mandamus, it is

ORDERED that the motion for expedited consideration be denied. See D.C. Circuit Handbook of Practice and Internal Procedures 40 (1987). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for writ of mandamus be denied. Petitioner has not met the burden of showing that the right to issuance of the extraordinary writ of mandamus is "clear and indisputable." See Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp., 485 U.S. 271, 289 (1988) (citations omitted). Further, petitioner has failed to demonstrate the inadequacy of the alternative remedies available upon appeal. In re GTE Service Corp., 762 F.2d 1024, 1026 (D.C. Cir. 1985).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.