Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America, Petitioner, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent,dorchester Hugoton, Ltd., Intervenor, 976 F.2d 46 (D.C. Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 976 F.2d 46 (D.C. Cir. 1992) Aug. 18, 1992

Before MIKVA, Chief Judge, and BUCKLEY and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.


Upon consideration of respondent's motion to dismiss, the response thereto and the reply, it is

ORDERED that the motion to dismiss be granted. Because the "practical effect" of any eventual state court judgment against petitioner cannot be determined at this time, the impact of the challenged order on petitioner is entirely speculative. See Southern Union Co. v. FERC, 857 F.2d 812 (D.C. Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1072 (1990). Therefore, the Commission's decision not to issue a declaratory order "lacks the concrete quality and immediacy necessary to invoke judicial review" at this time. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. v. FERC, 736 F.2d 747, 748 (D.C. Cir. 1984).

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 15.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.