Laurack D. Bray, Appellant, v. Chuck Hebble, et al, 976 F.2d 45 (D.C. Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 976 F.2d 45 (D.C. Cir. 1992) Aug. 28, 1992. Rehearing and Rehearing En BancDenied Dec. 4, 1992

Before WALD, SILBERMAN and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 14(c). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's order filed August 17, 1990, be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated therein.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 15.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.