United States of America v. Antonio E. Crump, Appellant, 961 F.2d 964 (D.C. Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseBefore MIKVA, Chief Judge, and RUTH BADER GINSBURG and BUCKLEY, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Upon consideration of the motion pursuant to Anders v. California, the memorandum in support thereof and the lack of response thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion to withdraw as counsel be granted. See McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 486 U.S. 429, 441-44 (1988); Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Suggs v. United States, 391 F.2d 971 (D.C. Cir. 1968). It is
FURTHER ORDERED, on the court's own motion, that this appeal be dismissed. An independent review of the record indicates that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. See Suggs, 391 F.2d at 978.
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 15.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
