United States of America v. Maurice E. Richmond, Appellant, 961 F.2d 964 (D.C. Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 961 F.2d 964 (D.C. Cir. 1992) April 24, 1992

Before MIKVA, Chief Judge and RUTH BADER GINSBURG and BUCKLEY Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.


These appeals were considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 14(c). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that appellants' sentences be affirmed. Appellants' failure to raise their objections to their sentences in district court in the first instance, although the judge afforded them ample opportunity to do so, precludes this court's consideration of those objections on appeal. See United States v. Bradshaw, 935 F.2d 295, 303 (D.C. Cir. 1991).

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 15.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.