Michael Sindram, Appellant, v. Shirley M. Nelson, et al, 957 F.2d 912 (D.C. Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 957 F.2d 912 (D.C. Cir. 1992) Feb. 11, 1992. Rehearing and Rehearing En BancDenied March 17, 1992

Before SILBERMAN, STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.


Upon consideration of appellees' motion for summary affirmance, the court's order to show cause and appellant's motion for summary reversal in response thereto, it is

ORDERED that the court's order to show cause be discharged. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for summary affirmance be granted substantially for the reasons stated by the district court in its order filed May 25, 1990. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (per curiam); Walker v. Washington, 627 F.2d 541, 545 (D.C. Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 994 (1980). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for summary reversal be denied.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 15.