Oscar H. Mendoza, et al., Petitioners, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent, 948 F.2d 781 (D.C. Cir. 1991)
Annotate this CaseBefore BUCKLEY, D.H. GINSBURG and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
This case was considered on the administrative record from the National Labor Relations Board and on the briefs and oral argument of counsel. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C. Cir. R. 14(c).
Petitioners, former employees of Phelps Dodge Refining Corporation, seek review of an order of the Board dismissing Petitioners' unfair labor practice complaint. Petitioners challenge the Board's interpretation of Phelps Dodge's disability plan as it relates to former strikers. Substantially for the reasons appearing in the Board's decision, we agree with the Board's interpretation of the contract. It is therefore
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the petition to review is denied.
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after the disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. R. 15(b) (2).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
