John M. May, Appellant, v. Alan Greenspan, 946 F.2d 1565 (D.C. Cir. 1991)Annotate this Case
Before SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY and STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Upon consideration of the motion for summary affirmance, the response thereto, the reply, and the rebuttal, it is
ORDERED that the motion be granted substantially for the reasons stated by the district court in its order filed July 17, 1990. The merits of the parties' positions are so clear so as to justify summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (per curiam); Walker v. Washington, 627 F.2d 541, 545 (D.C. Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 994 (1980).
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 15.