Ervin J. Horton, Appellant, v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board, et al, 946 F.2d 1565 (D.C. Cir. 1991)Annotate this Case
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, C.A. No. 90-00383; Lamberth, J.
Before MIKVA, Chief Judge, and RUTH B. GINSBURG and SILBERMAN, Circuit Judges.
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 14(c). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's order filed September 27, 1990, be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. This court will not consider appellant's newly-raised allegations concerning misapplication of bank funds because no exceptional circumstances exist that would justify a deviation from the general rule that "a federal appellate court does not consider an issue not passed upon below." Singleton v. Wulff, 428 U.S. 106, 120 (1976).
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 15.