Unpublished Dispositionjohn F.s. Duddey, Appellant, v. Clarence Thomas, Chairman Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 923 F.2d 200 (D.C. Cir. 1990)
Annotate this CaseBefore HARRY T. EDWARDS, RUTH BADER GINSBURG and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of appellant's "Dispositive Motion", and appellee's motion for summary affirmance and opposition to motion for summary reversal, it is
ORDERED that the "Dispositive Motion" for summary reversal be denied. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for summary affirmance be granted substantially for the reasons stated by the district court in its order filed March 6, 1990. The merits of the parties' positions are so clear as to justify summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (per curiam); Walker v. Washington, 627 F.2d 541, 545 (D.C. Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 994 (1980).
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 15.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
