Unpublished Dispositionbroyhill & Associates, Inc., Petitioner, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent, 911 F.2d 819 (D.C. Cir. 1990)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 911 F.2d 819 (D.C. Cir. 1990) Aug. 27, 1990

Before BUCKLEY, SENTELLE and CLARENCE THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.


This case was considered on the record on a petition for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board ("the Board") and the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 14(c). It is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the petition for review be denied. The Board's finding that the petitioners violated sections 8(a) (1) and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. 158(a) (1) and (3), by issuing a disciplinary warning to an employee for distributing a union flyer in a non-work area during non-work time and by subsequently discharging that employee as a result of his union activities is rational and supported by substantial evidence in the record. See Teamsters Local 175 v. NLRB, 788 F.2d 27, 30 (D.C. Cir. 1986). It is

FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the cross-application for enforcement be granted. The Board's Order resulting from proceedings upon the records of the Board as Case No. 4-CA-17580, 296 NLRB No. 115, is hereby enforced. Broyhill & Associates, Inc., its officers, agents, successors and assigns shall abide and perform the directions of the Board in the Order.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 15.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.