Unpublished Dispositionpeter James Atherton, Appellant, v. Attorney General of the United States, et al, 851 F.2d 1500 (D.C. Cir. 1988)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 851 F.2d 1500 (D.C. Cir. 1988) May 18, 1988

Before MIKVA, D.H. GINSBURG and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.


This case came to be heard on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and briefs were filed by the parties. The issues have been accorded full consideration by the court and occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 14(c). On consideration of the issues, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the district court's memorandum order, filed January 31, 1986, be affirmed. There are no genuine issues of material fact that suggest unlawful discharge; therefore, the district court was correct in granting summary judgment for appellee. See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-23 (1986).

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 15.