Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Kerbaugh, 74 F.2d 749 (1st Cir. 1935)
Annotate this CaseJanuary 16, 1935
v.
KERBAUGH.
Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
Harry Marselli, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen. (Frank J. Wideman, Asst. Atty. Gen., and J. Louis Monarch and Sewall Key, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., on the brief), for Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
Henry S. Kerbaugh, pro se.
*750 Argued before BINGHAM, WILSON, and MORTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The Board of Tax Appeals is authorized to establish its own rules of procedure and to determine whether those rules are complied with. Where their decision of such a question is not shown to be clearly wrong, it should not be disturbed.
The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
