Charles Clemons, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee, 314 F.2d 278 (D.C. Cir. 1963)
Annotate this CaseDecided January 31, 1963
Petition for Rehearing En Banc Denied En Banc February 15, 1963
Mr. Charles J. McKerns, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. John B. Jacob, Washington, D. C. (appointed by this court), was on the brief, for appellant.
Mr. Robert A. Levetown, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. David C. Acheson, U. S. Atty., and Frank Q. Nebeker and Victor W. Caputy, Asst. U. S. Attys., were on the brief, for appellee.
Before BAZELON, Chief Judge, and WILBUR K. MILLER and BURGER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Convicted of raping an 80-year-old woman in her apartment, Clemons appeals. He asserts the evidence against him was insufficient, as a matter of law, to go to the jury, and that the prosecuting attorney in his closing argument drew the jury's attention to the fact that he did not take the stand.
The victim was unable to identify her assailant except to the extent of saying he was a light-skinned Negro wearing a red flowered sport shirt and a narrow-brimmed straw hat. But strong circumstantial evidence that Clemons was the attacker1 amply justified submitting the case to the jury, and fully warranted that body in returning a verdict of guilty as charged.
In our view, the challenged remarks of the prosecutor did not refer to appellant's failure to testify.
Affirmed.
For example, a baseball ticket stub, admittedly used by appellant earlier in the evening, was found on the floor in the room in which the rape occurred
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
