In Re Edna E. Cory, Appellant, 311 F.2d 125 (D.C. Cir. 1962)
Annotate this CaseDecided November 8, 1962
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia; John J. Sirica, District Judge.
Mr. James A. Crooks, Washington, D. C. (appointed by the District Court), for appellant.
Mr. Ted D. Kuemmerling, Asst. Corp. Counsel for the District of Columbia with whom Messrs. Chester H. Gray, Corp. Counsel, Milton D. Korman, Prin. Asst. Corp. Counsel, and Hubert B. Pair, Asst. Corp. Counsel, were on the brief, for the District of Columbia.
Before FAHY, WASHINGTON and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal presents the sole question whether the District Court, notwithstanding a procedural defect in the initiation of the steps leading to the decree, was without jurisdiction to enter the decree. Being of opinion that in all the circumstances of the case the defect was an irregularity which did not deprive the court of jurisdiction, its decree is
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
