Esther Eden, Appellant, v. District of Columbia, Appellee.anna Bartle, Appellant, v. District of Columbia, Appellee, 265 F.2d 574 (D.C. Cir. 1959)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 265 F.2d 574 (D.C. Cir. 1959) Argued March 10, 1959
Decided March 19, 1959

Mr. Joseph H. Schneider, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Albert Ginsberg and Herbert D. Horowitz, Washington, D. C., were on the briefs, for appellants.

Mr. Hubert B. Pair, Asst. Corp. Counsel for District of Columbia, with whom Mr. Chester H. Gray, Corp. Counsel, and Mr. Milton D. Korman, Principal Asst. Corp. Counsel, were on the briefs, for appellee. Mr. Stanley De Neale, Asst. Corp. Counsel, also entered an appearance for appellee.

Before PRETTYMAN, Chief Judge, and BAZELON and BURGER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


These are appeals from awards in condemnation cases. In No. 14737 appellant entered no appearance in the proceeding in the District Court and made no attempt to note an appeal from the judgment of that court until after the period provided by statute had expired. In No. 14736 we find no error affecting substantial rights of the appellant.

No. 14736 affirmed; No. 14737 dismissed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.