Capital Transit Co. v. Platshon, 202 F.2d 368 (D.C. Cir. 1953)
Annotate this CaseDecided February 26, 1953
Frank F. Roberson, Washington, D. C., with whom George D. Horning, Jr., Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant.
David G. Bress, Washington, D. C., with whom John M. London, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellee.
Before EDGERTON, PRETTYMAN, and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Appellee has recovered judgment against appellant for personal injuries. Appellant contends the evidence of negligence was not sufficient. Though it seems to us, from the printed record, that this evidence was not strong and was strongly rebutted, we cannot say it was not substantial or that the jury which saw and heard the witnesses could not reasonably believe it. Accordingly we think the court was right in submitting the question of negligence to the jury. We have considered appellant's other contentions and find no error.
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
