In re Keinan
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 22-BG-809 IN RE YORAM KEINAN, A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals DDN: 2022-D046 Bar Registration No. 477195 BEFORE: Beckwith, Easterly, and Deahl, Associate Judges. ORDER (FILED— January 5, 2023) On consideration of the certified order from the state of New York suspending respondent by consent for one year and until further order of the court; this court’s October 28, 2022, order suspending respondent pending final disposition of this proceeding and directing him to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed; respondent’s D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit filed on November 9, 2022; and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel; and it appearing that respondent has not filed a response, it is ORDERED that Yoram Keinan is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for one year, nunc pro tunc to November 9, 2022. Respondent’s reinstatement is conditioned upon his reinstatement in New York and a showing of fitness. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483, 487-88 (D.C. 2010) (explaining that there is a rebuttable presumption in favor of imposition of identical discipline and exceptions to this presumption should be rare); In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (explaining that a rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate). PER CURIAM
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
