District of Columbia Court of Appeals Decisions

In 1970, Congress established the District of Columbia Court of Appeals as the highest court of the District of Columbia. The court consists of a chief judge and eight associate judges, as well as some senior judges, who are retired judges who have been recommended and approved to assist the court.

The D.C. Court of Appeals is the District’s equivalent of a state supreme court. As the court of last resort in D.C., the Court of Appeals is authorized to review all final orders, judgments, and specified interlocutory orders of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. The Court of Appeals also has jurisdiction to review contested case decisions of administrative agencies, boards, and commissions of the District of Columbia government, as well as to answer questions of law certified by federal and state appellate courts. As authorized by Congress, the Court reviews proposed rules of the Superior Court and promulgates its own rules. The Court also oversees attorneys who are members of its Bar.

Browse Opinions From the District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Recent Decisions From the District of Columbia Court of Appeals
George v. U.S. Bank National Association, as Legal Title Trustee for Truman 2016 Sc6 Title Trust (Per Curiam)
Date: February 7, 2025
Docket Numbers: 23-CV-0625, 23-CV-1038, 24-CV-0651, 24-CV-0583
Sanders v. United States  
Date: February 6, 2025
Docket Numbers: 17-CF-0544, 20-CO-0058

Justia Opinion Summary: The case involves William Donnette Sanders, who was convicted of multiple possessory offenses related to drugs, a gun, and other paraphernalia found in his car. The police discovered these items during a search of…

Warren v. United States (Per Curiam)
Date: February 6, 2025
Docket Number: 23-CO-0081
Kubichek v. Unlimited Biking Washington, DC, LLC  
Date: February 6, 2025
Docket Numbers: 23-CV-0411, 23-CV-0412

Justia Opinion Summary: Appellants Marilyn Kubichek and Dorothy Baldwin were injured on October 11, 2019, when they were struck by a Segway operated by Eduardo Samonte during a guided tour run by Unlimited Biking Washington, D.C., LLC. They…

In re Yoder (Per Curiam)
Date: February 6, 2025
Docket Number: 24-BG-1042
In re Whitted (Per Curiam)
Date: February 6, 2025
Docket Number: 24-BG-1043
In re Correa (Per Curiam)
Date: February 6, 2025
Docket Number: 24-BG-1044
In re Ali Khilji (Per Curiam)
Date: February 6, 2025
Docket Number: 24-BG-1148
Wilson v. Bowser  
Date: February 6, 2025
Docket Number: 24-CV-0397

Justia Opinion Summary: Appellant Charles E. Wilson filed a lawsuit against the District of Columbia Board of Elections, Mayor Muriel E. Bowser, and the District of Columbia, challenging the proposed ballot Initiative 83, also known as the…

Adetu v. Decaro, Doran, Sicilano, Gallagher & Deblasis, LLP, et al. (Per Curiam)
Date: February 5, 2025
Docket Number: 23-CV-0584
Khatri, et al. v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia (Per Curiam)
Date: February 4, 2025
Docket Numbers: 23-CV-0656, 23-CV-0673
Nduba v. United States (Per Curiam)
Date: February 3, 2025
Docket Number: 23-CF-0494
Sonmez v. WP Company, LLC  
Date: January 30, 2025
Docket Numbers: 22-CV-0274, 22-CV-0301

Justia Opinion Summary: A national news reporter employed by a prominent newspaper sued her employer and six of its editors in Superior Court, alleging violations of the D.C. Human Rights Act and the common law tort of negligent infliction of…

Brown v. United States (Per Curiam)
Date: January 29, 2025
Docket Number: 23-CF-0808
Richardson v. United States (Per Curiam)
Date: January 29, 2025
Docket Numbers: 23-CM-1063, 23-CM-1064
The opinions published on Justia State Caselaw are sourced from individual state court sites. These court opinions may not be the official published versions, and you should check your local court rules before citing to them. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or the information linked to on the state site.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.