In re Bailey
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 22-BG-486 IN RE JOHN-STUART W. BAILEY An Administratively Suspended Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals DDN2020-D084 Bar Registration No. 1012896 BEFORE: Easterly and Howard, Associate Judges, and Fisher, Senior Judge. ORDER (FILED—September 22, 2022) On consideration of the accurate copy of the order from the state of Maryland placing John-Stuart W. Bailey on inactive disability status by consent due to his claim of incapacity in a disciplinary matter; this court’s July 18, 2022, order suspending Mr. Bailey pending resolution of this matter and directing him to show cause why he should not be indefinitely suspended under D.C. Bar R. XI § 13(e) as reciprocal discipline, no response having been filed; the statement of Disciplinary Counsel; and it appearing that Mr. Bailey has not filed his D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit, it is ORDERED that John-Stuart W. Bailey is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(e). It is FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement, Mr. Bailey’s suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g). Mr. Bailey’s attention is also directed to the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(g) for reinstatement. PER CURIAM
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
