IN RE: STEVEN H. BERKOWITZ

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 16-BG-469 8/4/16 IN RE: STEVEN H. BERKOWITZ, Respondent. Bar Registration No. 104315 BEFORE: DDN: 3-16 Glickman, Associate Judge, and Nebeker and Farrell, Senior Judges. ORDER (FILED - August 4, 2016) On consideration of the certified order changing respondent’s status to practice law in the state of Pennsylvania to disability inactive and staying the resolution of his pending disciplinary grievance, this court’s June 3, 2016, order suspending respondent and directing him to show cause why he should not be indefinitely suspended pursuant to a disability suspension under D.C. Bar R. XI § 13, and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file either a response to this court’s order to show cause or the affidavit as required by D.C. Bar R. XI, §14 (g), it is ORDERED that Steven H. Berkowitz is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI § 13. It is FURTHER ORDERED that respondent’s attention is directed to requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI § 14 relating to suspended attorneys and to provisions of Rule XI § 16 (c) dealing with the timing of eligibility reinstatement as related to compliance with D.C. Bar R. XI § 14, including filing of the required affidavit. PER CURIAM the the for the

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.