In re: Douglas P. Wachholz

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. District of Columbia Court of Appeals No. 14-BS-289 IN RE: DOUGLAS P. WACHHOLZ Respondent. Bar Registration No. 930792 BDN: 464-11 BEFORE: Blackburne-Rigsby and Beckwith, Associate Judges; and King, Senior Judge. ORDER (Filed - April 17, 2014) On consideration of the affidavit of Douglas P. Wachholz, wherein he consents to disbarment from the Bar of the District of Columbia pursuant to § 12 of Rule XI of the Rules Governing the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, which affidavit has been filed with the Clerk of this Court, and the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility with respect thereto, it is this 17th day of April, 2014, ORDERED that the said Douglas P. Wachholz is hereby disbarred by consent effective forthwith. The effective date of respondent s disbarment shall run, for reinstatement purposes, from the date respondent files a compliant affidavit pursuant to D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 14 (g). It is FURTHER ORDERED that Bar Counsel s petition for reciprocal discipline, which was referred to the Board on Professional Responsibility for substantially different discipline from that imposed by the Presiding Disciplinary Judge for the Supreme Court of Colorado, be denied as moot. The Clerk shall publish this order, but the affidavit shall not be publicly disclosed or otherwise made available except upon order of the Court or upon written consent of the respondent. The Clerk shall cause a copy of this order to be transmitted to the Chairman of the Board on Professional Responsibility and to the respondent, thereby giving him notice of the provisions of Rule XI, §§ 14 and 16, which set forth certain responsibilities of disbarred attorneys and the effect of failure to comply therewith. PER CURIAM.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.