Charlene McCamey v. DC DOES

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

District of Columbia Court of Appeals No. 04-AA-211 CHARLENE McCAMEY, Petitioner, DKT10-03 v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, Respondent. BEFORE: Washington, Chief Judge; *Schwelb, Farrell, *Ruiz, Reid, Glickman, Kramer and Fisher, Associate Judges; *King, Senior Judge. ORDER (Filed March 15, 2006) On consideration of petitioner's petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, and the opposition thereto, it is ORDERED by the merits division* that the petition for rehearing is denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of November 10, 2005, are hereby vacated. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the calendar permits. It is FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's brief shall be filed on or before April 24, 2006, and respondent's brief shall be filed on or before May 24, 2006. Petitioner may file a reply brief no later than June 8, 2006. Each party shall file ten copies of its briefs. These new briefs shall be specifically designed for consideration by and addressed to the en banc court and shall supersede all briefs previously filed in this appeal. It is FURTHER ORDERED that any requests for extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and will be granted only upon a showing of good cause. PER CURIAM

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.