In the Matter of Ruthann Aron, Esquire

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 99-BG-342 In the Matter of RUTHANN ARON, ESQUIRE A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals BDN: 45-99 BEFORE: Steadman, Ruiz, and Glickman, Associate Judges. ORDER (FILED - March 1, 2001) On consideration of the affidavit of Ruthann Aron, wherein she consents to disbarment from the Bar of the District of Columbia pursuant to § 12 of Rule XI of the Rules Governing the Bar of the District of Columbia, which affidavit has been filed with the Clerk of this Court, and the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility with respect thereto, it is this 1st day of March, 2001 ORDERED that the said Ruthann Aron, is hereby disbarred by consent effective nunc pro tunc to March 31, 1999. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Bar Counsel s petition for discipline based upon respondent s criminal conviction in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland is hereby dismissed as moot. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the reciprocal matter be dismissed as moot, without prejudice to Bar Counsel reinstating a reciprocal discipline proceeding if respondent should seek reinstatement while her Maryland suspension is in effect. The Clerk shall publish this order, but the affidavit shall not be publicly disclosed or otherwise made available except upon order of the Court or upon written consent of the respondent. The Clerk shall cause a copy of this order to be transmitted to the Chairman of the Board on Professional Responsibility and to the respondent, thereby giving him notice of the provisions of Rule XI, § 14 and 16, which set forth certain rights and responsibilities of disbarred attorneys and the effect of failure to comply therewith. PER CURIAM.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.