Liberty Bank of Ark. v. Byrd (Per Curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 729 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS EN BANC CV-15-168 No. Opinion Delivered December 16, 2015 LIBERTY BANK OF ARKANSAS, AS APPEAL FROM THE POPE TRUSTEE OF THE VERNON E. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ARNOLD REVOCABLE TRUST [NO. CV-2013-201] APPELLANT HONORABLE WILLIAM M. V. PEARSON, JUDGE CLYDE E. BYRD, JR., EXECUTOR REBRIEFING ORDERED OF THE ESTATE OF ARDELLIA D. BYRD ARNOLD, DECEASED APPELLEE PER CURIAM Liberty Bank of Arkansas (the bank), as trustee of the Vernon E. Arnold Revocable Trust (the trust), appeals from the order of the Pope County Circuit Court imposing a constructive trust on the trust’s assets in favor of appellee Clyde Byrd. Byrd cross-appeals from the circuit court’s award of attorney’s fees to the bank from assets subject to the constructive trust. We do not reach the merits of the appeal and, instead, order rebriefing because of both parties’ lack of compliance with Administrative Order No. 19. 1 Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 729 Administrative Order No. 19 pertains to access to court records, and Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-1(d) requires compliance with its protective requirements for confidential information. Section VII(A) of Administrative Order No. 19 details the information to be excluded from public access and deemed confidential absent a court order to the contrary. Such information includes Social Security numbers and account numbers of specific assets, liabilities, accounts, credit cards, and personal identification numbers. Ark. Sup. Ct. Admin. Order No. 19 (VII)(A)(4) & (5). Both parties indicated in their informational statements that this appeal involves confidential information as defined by section (III)(A)(11) and (VII)(A) of Administrative Order No. 19. Further, both parties certified that they have complied with Administrative Order No. 19. However, there are several instances where full bank account numbers and Social Security numbers are not redacted. For example, there is one exhibit that consists of unredacted bank statements over a period of several years. There are several tax returns included in the addendum. Most have the parties’ Social Security numbers redacted; however, there are at least two sets that are not redacted. Also, the circuit court’s final order, as well as an amendatory order, sets out full account numbers. Byrd’s brief on cross-appeal contains a twenty-five page summary of transactions. Although the account number is redacted at the top of each page, some of the transactions reference Edward Jones accounts with the account number not redacted. 2 Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 729 We recently ordered rebriefing in a similar situation. Cummings v. Cummings, 2015 Ark. App. 517. We noted that, with the benefit of technological advances, the failure to redact is particularly egregious because our records are available online and easily accessible by the public, potentially leading to the abuse of the parties’ confidential information. As in Cummings, we order rebriefing. The parties are directed to file redacted briefs in compliance with Administrative Order No. 19 within fifteen days from the date of this per curiam. 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
