Murray v. State

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Cite as 2011 Ark. App. 625 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV No. CACR10-704 Opinion Delivered OCTOBER ELEA LEE MURRAY, III APPELLANT 26, 2011 APPEAL FROM THE CRITTENDEN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. CR-2007-1103] HONORABLE DAVID N. LASER, JUDGE V. STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED JOSEPHINE LINKER HART, Judge This court ordered rebriefing in Murray v. State, 2011 Ark. App. 431, wherein the court recounted this case s procedural history and explained why counsel s brief failed to satisfy the requirements for an appeal in which counsel asserted that the appeal was without merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4 3(k). Counsel now has filed a new, no-merit brief. The clerk of this court furnished the new brief to appellant and notified him of his right to file pro se points for reversal within thirty days. Appellant did not do so. After reviewing the record and counsel s brief, we hold that counsel has filed a complying no-merit brief and conclude that the appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we grant the motion filed by counsel to withdraw and affirm. Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted. GRUBER and BROWN, JJ., agree.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.