Evans v. State
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Cite as 2010 Ark. App. 621
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION I
CACR10-68
No.
STEVEN W. EVANS
Opinion Delivered SEPTEMBER 22, 2010
APPELLANT
V.
APPEAL FROM THE WHITE
COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
[CR-2009-81]
STATE OF ARKANSAS
HONORABLE ROBERT EDWARDS,
JUDGE
APPELLEE
AFFIRMED
RITA W. GRUBER, Judge
Steven W. Evans was charged in White County Circuit Court with first-degree battery
and aggravated assault for events that occurred in front of his home the night of January 16,
2009. He was tried before the bench, was found guilty on both counts, and was sentenced
to two concurrent terms of six years’ imprisonment. In his sole point on appeal, he challenges
the sufficiency of the evidence to support the convictions. He does not deny that he fired a
.40-caliber pistol and injured a passenger in a car from which paint balls had been shot at his
home; he asserts that his actions were justified as self-defense. The issue is not preserved for
our review.
In a nonjury trial, if a motion for dismissal is to be made, it shall be made at the close
of all of the evidence and shall state the specific grounds thereof. Ark. R. Crim. P. 33.1(b);
Marcyniuk v. State, 2010 Ark. 257, ___ S.W.3d ___. The failure of a defendant to challenge
Cite as 2010 Ark. App. 621
the sufficiency of the evidence at the times and in the manner required by the rule constitutes
a waiver of any question pertaining to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict
or judgment. Ark. R. Crim. P. 33.1(c). A closing argument does not substitute for a motion
to dismiss. State v. Holmes, 347 Ark. 689, 66 S.W.3d 640 (2002).
The defense presented its case after the State rested. Evans testified that he fired the
pistol in self-defense, thinking that he heard shots from a small-caliber weapon and feeling
that his life and property were in danger. In a closing argument made at the conclusion of
all the evidence, defense counsel argued that Evans acted in self-defense and was justified in
shooting back because he thought someone was shooting a real gun at him. Counsel did not
move for dismissal at any time.
Because Evans made no motion challenging the sufficiency of the evidence and
arguing the defense of justification, he has waived the issue for purposes of appeal.
Affirmed.
HENRY and BAKER, JJ., agree.
-2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.