Teague v. State
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Cite as 2010 Ark. App. 468
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION IV
No. CACR09-144
Opinion Delivered
JUSTIN CHARLES TEAGUE
APPELLANT
V.
STATE OF ARKANSAS
June 2, 2010
APPEAL FROM THE SEBASTIAN
COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
[NOS. CR-05-1049D, CR-06-679]
HONORABLE JAMES O. COX,
JUDGE
APPELLEE
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED
M. MICHAEL KINARD, Judge
Justin Charles Teague appeals from the trial court’s revocation of his suspended
sentence. Appellant’s attorney has filed a no-merit brief and a motion to withdraw as counsel.
We affirm the judgment of the trial court and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
Appellant pled guilty to charges of felon in possession of a firearm and possession of
drug paraphernalia on September 30, 2005. He received three years’ imprisonment in the
Arkansas Department of Correction with seven years’ suspended imposition of sentence. The
terms of his suspended sentence required that appellant not violate any federal, state, or
municipal law; not frequent places where alcoholic beverages were sold; not associate with
persons with criminal records; and pay a public-defender fee in the amount of $100.
In June 2006, appellant pled guilty to charges of breaking or entering and seconddegree forgery. Appellant received sixty months’ suspended imposition of sentence. The
Cite as 2010 Ark. App. 468
terms of appellant’s suspended imposition of sentence for the 2006 conviction provided that
he was not to violate any federal, state, or municipal law; not to frequent places where
alcoholic beverages were sold; not to associate with persons with criminal records; and that
he was to pay restitution, a public-defender fee, and a DNA fee.
On July 8, 2008, the State filed a petition to revoke in which the State alleged that
appellant committed the offenses of possession of methamphetamine with intent to deliver
and possession of drug paraphernalia. The State further alleged that appellant failed to pay the
publi- defender fee as required under the terms of his 2005 suspended sentence. In addition,
the State alleged that appellant failed to pay restitution, the public-defender fee, and the DNA
fee as required under the terms of his 2006 suspended sentence.1 Following a hearing on the
State’s petition to revoke, the circuit court found that appellant violated the terms of his
suspended sentences by 1) drinking beer in a tavern; 2) associating with persons with criminal
records; and 3) failing to pay fines. Appellant was found in contempt for failure to pay
restitution in the 2002 case, although no punishment was imposed. In a judgment and
commitment order entered November 12, 2008, the circuit court sentenced appellant to
seven years’ imprisonment in the Arkansas Department of Correction with an additional three
years’ suspended imposition of sentence. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal to this
court.
The State also alleged that appellant failed to pay restitution in a 2002 case, although
there is no other documentation in the record relating to a case from 2002, save for a notation
on the 2005 judgment and commitment order that a petition to revoke in the 2002 case was
being withdrawn.
1
-2-
Cite as 2010 Ark. App. 468
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Arkansas Supreme Court
Rule 4-3(k), counsel for appellant has filed a brief and motion to withdraw arguing that there
are no meritorious points for reversal. Included in the brief is an abstract of the revocation
hearing, including all of the rulings adverse to appellant. Appellant was given the opportunity
to file pro se points for reversal, but did not do so. Because appellant did not file any pro se
points for reversal, the State elected not to file a brief.
The only objection raised during the hearing was a relevancy objection. During crossexamination of appellant, the State asked appellant where he would buy and use drugs.
Appellant’s counsel objected on the basis that the question was not relevant. The circuit court
overruled the objection, stating, “He’s here on PTR [revocation] relative to that.” The trial
court’s overruling of appellant’s objection does not raise a meritorious point for reversal.
Appellant’s revocation was not based upon anything contained in his answer to the question.
The circuit court also revoked appellant’s suspended sentence due to him consuming
alcohol in a tavern and associating with persons with a criminal record, violations which were
not alleged by the State in the petition to revoke. It is a violation of a defendant’s right to
due process to revoke based on a violation that is not enumerated in the revocation petition.
See Hill v. State, 65 Ark. App. 131, 985 S.W.2d 342 (1999) (citing Robinson v. State, 14 Ark.
App. 38, 684 S.W.2d 824 (1985)). However, this is not a valid point for reversal in this case
because the argument does not address the other basis for revocation. The State is only
-3-
Cite as 2010 Ark. App. 468
required to prove one of the grounds contained in the revocation petition. Phillips v. State,
101 Ark. App. 190, 272 S.W.3d 123 (2008).
The State produced restitution records showing that appellant was behind on his
restitution in one case and had not paid any restitution in another case. Appellant admitted
at the hearing that he failed to pay restitution and did not provide a legitimate explanation for
his failure to pay. If a circuit court places a criminal defendant on probation or imposes a
suspended imposition of sentence for an offense and orders that the defendant pay restitution
to the victims of the offense, the failure to pay that restitution is by itself a valid ground for
revocation. Ark. Code Ann. § 5-4-303(h)(2)(B)(ii) (Repl. 2006). We affirm the revocation
of appellant’s probation and grant counsel for appellant’s motion to withdraw.
Affirmed; motion granted.
BAKER and BROWN, JJ., agree.
-4-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.