Richie v. State
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Slip Opinion
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION I
No. CACR08-793
Opinion Delivered July
JEREMY MICHAEL RICHIE
APPELLANT
1, 2009
APPEAL FROM THE FAULKNER
COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
[NO. CR2004-388]
V.
HONORABLE CHARLES E.
CLAWSON, JR., JUDGE
STATE OF ARKANSAS
APPELLEE
REBRIEFING ORDERED
JOSEPHINE LINKER HART, Judge
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-3(k),
Jeremy Michael Richie’s counsel filed a motion to withdraw on grounds that the appeal is
wholly without merit. The clerk of this court sent Richie a certified copy of his counsel’s
brief and motion to be relieved and informed him that he had the right to file pro se points
for reversal, which Richie filed. Because there are two issues relating to whether Richie
possibly received an illegal sentence, we conclude that an appeal would not be wholly
frivolous, and accordingly, we remand for rebriefing.
At the outset, we observe that an issue of an illegal sentence goes to subject-matter
jurisdiction, and we may review the issue whether or not an objection was made in the circuit
court. Donaldson v. State, 370 Ark. 3, 257 S.W.3d 74 (2007). A sentence is void or illegal
when the court lacks authority to impose it. Id.
According to a judgment and disposition order filed February 4, 2005, Richie pleaded
guilty to two Class C felonies, and on each count, the circuit court placed him on probation
for sixty months. The State later filed a petition to revoke Richie’s probation. A judgment
and disposition order filed May 31, 2005, shows that, following a guilty plea, Richie’s
probation was revoked, and on each count, he was sentenced to twelve months’
imprisonment to be followed by probation for sixty months. The State again filed a petition
to revoke. At the February 15, 2008, revocation hearing, Richie pleaded guilty, and the court
heard evidence on sentencing. According to the judgment and commitment order filed March
14, 2008, the court sentenced him on the two Class C felonies to concurrent terms of ten
years’ imprisonment. Further, both at the hearing and in the judgment and commitment order,
the court ordered Richie to participate in drug and alcohol treatment and counseling. In his
pro se points, Richie appears to challenge both the length of his sentence and the court’s
order that he attend drug and alcohol treatment and counseling.
When a court revokes probation, it may impose any sentence that might have been
imposed originally for the offense. Ark. Code Ann. § 5-4-309(f)(1)(A) (Repl. 2006).
However, any sentence of imprisonment, when combined with any previous imprisonment
imposed for the same offense, should not exceed statutory limits. Ark. Code Ann. § 5-4309(f)(1)(B). For a Class C felony, it is no more than ten years. Ark. Code Ann. §
5-64-401(a)(4) (Repl. 2006).
Furthermore, in addition to being sentenced to imprisonment for a Class C felony, a
-2-
CACR08-793
defendant also may be sentenced to probation, payment of a fine, restitution, or imprisonment
and payment of a fine, Ark. Code Ann. § 5-4-104(d) (Repl. 2006), and unless otherwise
provided, may receive a suspended imposition of sentence, Ark. Code Ann. § 5-4-104(e).
Also, the circuit court is not deprived of any authority conferred by law to order a forfeiture
of property, suspend or cancel a license, dissolve a corporation, remove a person from office,
cite for contempt, impose any civil penalty, or assess costs. Ark. Code Ann. § 5-4-104(g). A
defendant cannot be sentenced otherwise than in accordance with the disposition of offenders
chapter provisions. Ark. Code Ann. § 5-4-104(d).
Two issues arise regarding the legality of Richie’s sentence. First, we note that when
Richie’s probation was first revoked, he was sentenced to one year of imprisonment on each
Class C felony, and when his probation was revoked a second time, he was sentenced to ten
years of imprisonment on each count. Thus, there is an issue that is not wholly frivolous
regarding whether Richie’s sentence to imprisonment exceeded the ten years allowed for a
Class C felony. Further, there is an issue not wholly frivolous regarding whether the circuit
court could order Richie to participate in drug treatment and counseling during his
incarceration. See Seamster v. State, 2009 Ark. 258, at 6 n.3 (questioning what is meant by
the terms “condition of a sentence of imprisonment” and “condition of incarceration”).
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to be relieved is denied, and counsel is ordered to prepare and
file within thirty days a brief in adversarial form addressing the legality of Richie’s sentence.
Rebriefing ordered.
-3-
CACR08-793
G LOVER and M ARSHALL, JJ., agree.
-4-
CACR08-793
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.