Tipps v. State
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION II
No.
CACR08-1120
THOMAS JUSTIN TIPPS,
Opinion Delivered 6
MAY 2009
APPELLANT
APPEAL FROM THE ASHLEY
COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT,
[NO. CR06-156-4]
V.
STATE OF ARKANSAS,
APPELLEE
THE HONORABLE DON GLOVER,
JUDGE
AFFIRMED
D. P. MARSHALL JR. , Judge
John Murdaugh took his brown and tan 1988 Dodge Dakota pickup truck to
Bill’s Garage in Portland, Arkansas for a transmission repair. Keys inside, the vehicle
disappeared from the parking lot before Murdaugh picked it up. Neither Murdaugh
nor Bill’s Garage had authorized anyone to take the truck. About a week later,
Thomas Tipps confessed that he had taken a brown and tan Dodge Dakota truck from
Bill’s Garage, driven it to a body shop, and sold it for $150.00. A jury convicted Tipps
of Class B felony theft. Ark. Code Ann. §§ 5-36-101(12)(A) & 103 (Supp. 2007).
Tipps appeals, making two sufficiency challenges: He says that the evidence failed to
prove that the truck was worth at least $2,500.00 or that a crime occurred.
Murdaugh testified that he paid $5,500.00 for the truck about seven years before
it went missing. He drove it daily; it had good wheels and a transmission problem;
and he testified that his pick-up “was worth more than, you know, $2,500.” For
sentimental reasons, Murdaugh said that the truck was worth “at least $5000.00” to
him. An employee at Bill’s Garage who had worked on the vehicle on “numerous
occasions” also put a value on the truck. Without objection, he testified that
Murdaugh’s pick-up was worth “about $2,500.00.” He testified that Bill’s Garage
bought vehicles in the past, but had quit dealing in used cars. The employee also said
that he was no expert in looking at vehicles and putting a price on them.
Taken as a whole, this record provided substantial evidence on the pick-up’s fair
market value when it disappeared. We put aside Murdaugh’s sentimental valuation.
Given the passage of time between purchase and theft, Murdaugh’s testimony about
what he had paid for his truck, maintenance, and condition provided relevant but not
conclusive circumstantial evidence on value for purposes of the statute. Ayers v. State,
334 Ark. 258, 268, 975 S.W.2d 88, 93–94 (1998). The additional testimony from the
employee of Bill’s Garage, however, made a jury question on value. Expert testimony,
as Tipps urges, would have been better proof. Ayers, 334 Ark. at 268, 975 S.W.2d at
93. But Tipps did not object to the employee’s valuation testimony, and crossexamined the employee about his knowledge of this particular truck. Added to
Murdaugh’s opinion, the employee’s lay opinion, based as it was on his personal
knowledge, suffices. Ark. R. Evid. 701; Ross v. State, 300 Ark. 369, 379–80, 779
S.W.2d 161, 166 (1989).
-2-
Tipps confessed to taking a truck like Murdaugh’s from Bill’s Garage. Because
Tipps did not repeat his confession in open court, however, the State had to offer
other proof that someone committed the crime of theft. Ark. Code Ann. § 16-89111(d) (Repl. 2005). In the old phrase, the State had to show the corpus delicti. Ferrell
v. State, 325 Ark. 455, 460, 929 S.W.2d 697, 701 (1996). It did. The testimony of
Murdaugh and the Bill’s Garage employee established that someone took the pick-up
from the parking lot without permission.
Affirmed.
VAUGHT, C.J., and BAKER, J., agree.
-3-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.